Most likely by "I printed this design". In anyway most likely that's only me who made it :)
Kirk Cooper
over 7 years
How do you see if others have made this?
nieborfax
over 8 years
This looks great. I was just considering making RIch's Slider printer and i think this will help me tremendously. I look forwarder to adopting some of hour idea.
Gediminas
over 9 years
<p>Hi,</p><p>Thank you for showing interest in my design, and sorry for long delay w/out update. I'm going to dedicate more time for this project this weekend, so I expect I'll have better progress on that. For now just a few changes on design (updates are in description).</p>
sgraber
over 9 years
<p>Any further updates?</p>
Gediminas
over 9 years
@Bearwood in theory yes, but my Z axis precision is 0.01mm. 360 / 1.8 (angle/step) = 200 steps to move around. In one cycle Z axis moves 2mm. 2mm/200=0.01mm
My biggest concern using this type of axis was what weight this axis is capable to move. I just did a test with 2.6kg moving up and I didn't have any issues.
If you have z-wobble it could be solved making Z axis loossly coupled to the bed like in MendelMax design (check page 42 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xkqIbNjqopCkrOkwJX_i-BKoRBu3syexM9-6eJNrW8o/edit). I didn't see any visible wobble, but I'll check later with micrometer. Tomorrow I'm leaving for my one month vacation, so I'll update with my status in April.
Bearwood
almost 10 years
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="/users/Gediminas" class="mentioned-user">@Gediminas</a> In theory the geared stepper and spectra will give a finer resolution. Also like <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="/users/sgraber" class="mentioned-user">@sgraber</a> said you don't get the z-wobble/sync issues. Plenty of others are using belts to great advantage so keep going that road.</p><p>@sgrabber I have been looking at lots of ideas over the last wee while but I keep coming back to this one. I need to settle on an idea and run with it but my current printer keeps having issues which diverts my attention :-(</p>
sgraber
almost 10 years
@Gediminas: Part of it is to preserve the Sli3dr design, the other part is that I've grown tired of diagnosing / fixing z-wobble.
Gediminas
almost 10 years
@Bearwood @sgraber, what is the advantage of spectra driven Z-axis? I'm just curious maybe I'm missing something choosing lead screw.
Myp
almost 10 years
<p>Mount 6mm shafts in XY carriage is very weak.</p><p>and possibly shafts X and Y should be placed in the same plane. 6mm shafts should be lowered down to ~7 mm</p><p>something like this: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://i62.tinypic.com/2m08dz.jpg">http://i62.tinypic.com/2m08dz.jpg</a> or like this: <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://i62.tinypic.com/290rmsw.jpg">http://i62.tinypic.com/290rmsw.jpg</a></p>
sgraber
almost 10 years
@Bearwood: I'm with you. I'd like to backport the original spectra driven z-axis into this design. Have you started working on it?
Gediminas
almost 10 years
I do expect to get flanged bearings for Z-axis in a week or two (china post is very slow). And then I will approve/improve this design. Basically it works for Ultimaker, should work fine here too.
Bearwood
almost 10 years
Nice clean look.
I'll have to think about adapting this to the original spectra driven dual supported Z axis.
Gediminas
almost 10 years
Yes, I was thinking to convert to 8mm too, but later decided to give a try to 6mm. These rods only 315mm long and carriage is not really heavy. So I think it should be fine to go with 6mm.
6mm x2 rods weights 140g, 8mm x2 rods weights 250g, so it's 44% (110g) lighter in rods only (plus 4 bearings). That's the reason for me to try 6mm rods.
BTW, help is always needed. For example reviewing design and improving it! :)
sgraber
almost 10 years
<p>Any way I can help?</p><p>Edit: I've updated the XY carriage and smooth rod holders to M8, which might help.</p>